Development of an immune-nutritional prognostic index in patients with muscle-infiltrating bladder cancer candidates for radical cystectomy.

INTRODUCTION: Muscle-infiltrating bladder tumor (MIBT) has a recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 50% at 5 years. Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) has increased it by 8%, which group of patients benefits the most from this treatment remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the prognostic value of immune-nutritional status in patients with MIBT who are candidates for cystectomy, and to develop a score that allows identifying patients with a worse prognosis (pT3-4 and/or pN0-1). MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out on 284 patients with MIBT treated with radical cystectomy. Preoperative laboratory tests were analyzed and immune-nutritional indices were calculated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the PFS. Cox regression was used for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed a statistically significant relationship with leukocyte/lymphocyte index (p = 0.0001), neutrophil/lymphocyte index (p = 0.02), prognostic nutritional index (p = 0.002), and platelet/lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.002). In multivariate analysis, the leukocyte/lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.002) and PNI (p = 0.04) behaved as independent prognostic factors of decreased RFS. Based on these, a prognostic score was developed to classify patients into 3 prognostic groups. Eighty percent of patients with pT3-4 and/or pN0-1 tumors were in the intermediate-poor prognostic groups. CONCLUSION: The implementation of a precystectomy immune-nutritional score in clinical practice would help in the selection of a group of patients with a more unfavorable pathologic stage and worse PFS. We believe that these patients could benefit more from a NACT.

Extracción renal en donante cadáver: revisión sistemática de la técnica quirúrgica / Deceased donor kidney procurement: systematic review of the surgical technique

Introducción El proceso de extracción renal debe ser una técnica estandarizada con el fin de optimizar las unidades renales para su posterior implante. Objetivos Revisión de la literatura disponible sobre el proceso de extracción renal. Material y métodos Revisión narrativa de la evidencia disponible sobre la técnica de extracción renal en paciente cadáver tras una búsqueda de los manuscritos relevantes indexados en PubMed, EMBASE y SciELO escritos en español e inglés. Resultados La extracción renal en paciente cadáver se divide en dos grupos, tras muerte encefálica (donation after brain death [DBD]) y tras muerte cardiaca (donation after circulatory death [DCD]). La extracción renal en DBD suele acompañarse de la extracción de otros órganos abdominales y/o torácicos, lo que requiere coordinación quirúrgica multidisciplinar. Durante el proceso de extracción debe asegurarse que los pedículos vasculares renales se mantienen íntegros para su posterior implante y disminuir el tiempo de isquemia. Conclusiones La ejecución adecuada y el perfecto conocimiento de la técnica quirúrgica de extracción y de la anatomía, permite disminuir el índice de pérdidas de injertos relacionados con una incorrecta extracción (AU)

Introduction Kidney procurement procedure must be carried out following a standardized technique in order to optimize kidney grafts for their subsequent implantation. Objectives Review of the available literatura on kidney procurement procedure. Material and methods Narrative review of the available evidence on deceased donor kidney procurement technique after a search of relevant manuscripts indexed in PubMed, EMBASE and Scielo written in English and Spanish. Result Deceased donor kidney procurement can be divided into two groups, donation after brain death (DBD) and donation after circulatory death (DCD). Kidney procurement in DBD frequently includes other chest and/or abdominal organs, requiring multidisciplinary surgical coordination. During the harvesting procedure, the renal vascular pedicle must remain intact for subsequent implantation and reduced ischemia time. Conclusions Adequate execution and perfect knowledge of the technique for surgical removal and anatomy reduces the rate of graft losses associated to inadequate harvesting techniques (AU)

Elaboración de un índice pronóstico inmunonutricional en pacientes con cáncer de vejiga músculo-infiltrante candidatos a cistectomía radical / Development of an immune-nutritional prognostic index in patients with muscle-infiltrating bladder cancer candidates for radical cystectomy

Introducción El tumor vesical músculo-infiltrante (TVMI) tiene una supervivencia libre de recidiva (SLR) del 50% a los cinco años, la quimioterapia neoadyuvante (QTN) ha aumentado la misma un 8%, pero no está claro qué pacientes se pueden beneficiar en mayor grado de la misma. Objetivo Evaluar el valor pronóstico del estado inmunológico-nutricional en los pacientes con TVMI candidatos a cistectomía, y desarrollar un score que permita identificar precistectomía a los pacientes con peor pronóstico (pT3-4 y/o pN0-1). Material y método Se realizó un análisis retrospectivo de 284 pacientes con TVMI tratados con cistectomía radical. Se revisó la analítica preoperatoria y se calcularon índices inmunonutricionales. El método de Kaplan-Meier se utilizó para el cálculo de la SLR. Para el análisis multivariante se utilizó la regresión de Cox. Resultados Mediante análisis univariante se observó una relación estadísticamente significativa con el índice leucocito/linfocito (p = 0,0001), el índice neutrófilo/linfocito (p = 0,02) el índice pronóstico nutricional (p = 0,002), y el ratio plaqueta/linfocito (p = 0,002). En análisis multivariante, el ratio leucocito/linfocito (p = 0,002) y el IPN (p = 0,04) se comportaron como factores pronósticos independientes de disminución de SLR, y se elaboró con ello un score pronóstico que divide a los pacientes en tres grupos pronósticos. El 80% de los pacientes con tumores pT3-4 y/o pN0-1 se encontraban en los grupos de pronóstico medio-malo. Conclusión La incorporación en la práctica clínica de un score inmunonutricional precistectomía ayudaría a seleccionar a un grupo de pacientes con estadio patológico más desfavorable y peor SLR. Creemos que estos pacientes podrían beneficiarse en mayor medida de una QTN (AU)

Introduction Muscle-infiltrating bladder tumor (MIBT) has a recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 50% at 5 years. Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) has increased it by 8%, which group of patients benefits the most from this treatment remains unclear. Objective Evaluate the prognostic value of immune-nutritional status in patients with MIBT who are candidates for cystectomy, and to develop a score that allows identifying patients with a worse prognosis (pT3-4 and/or pN0-1). Material and methods A retrospective analysis was carried out on 284 patients with MIBT treated with radical cystectomy. Preoperative laboratory tests were analyzed and immune-nutritional indices were calculated. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to calculate the PFS. Cox regression was used for multivariate analysis. Results Univariate analysis showed a statistically significant relationship with leukocyte/lymphocyte index (p = 0.0001), neutrophil/lymphocyte index (p = 0.02), prognostic nutritional index (p = 0.002), and platelet/lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.002). In multivariate analysis, the leukocyte/lymphocyte ratio (p = 0.002) and PNI (p = 0.04) behaved as independent prognostic factors of decreased RFS. Based on these, a prognostic score was developed to classify patients into 3 prognostic groups. Eighty percent of patients with pT3-4 and/or pN0-1 tumors were in the intermediate–poor prognostic groups. Conclusion The implementation of a precystectomy immune-nutritional score in clinical practice would help in the selection of a group of patients with a more unfavorable pathologic stage and worse PFS. We believe that these patients could benefit more from a NACT (AU)

Deceased donor kidney procurement: Systematic review of the surgical technique.

INTRODUCTION: Kidney procurement procedure must be carried out following a standardized technique in order to optimize kidney grafts for their subsequent implantation. OBJECTIVES: Review of the available literature on kidney procurement procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Narrative review of the available evidence on deceased donor kidney procurement technique after a search of relevant manuscripts indexed in PubMed, EMBASE and Scielo written in English and Spanish. RESULTS: Deceased donor kidney procurement can be divided into two groups, donation after brain death (DBD) and donation after circulatory death (DCD). Kidney procurement in DBD frequently includes other chest and/or abdominal organs, requiring multidisciplinary surgical coordination. During the harvesting procedure, the renal vascular pedicle must remain intact for subsequent implantation and reduced ischemia time. CONCLUSIONS: Adequate execution and perfect knowledge of the technique for surgical removal and anatomy reduces the rate of graft losses associated to inadequate harvesting techniques.

Evolución de la función renal en pacientes con cáncer renal cT1 después de nefrectomía parcial y radical laparoscópica. Factores predictores de deterioro de función renal / Evolution of renal function in patients with cT1 renal tumors after laparoscopic partial and radical nephrectomy. Predictive factors for renal function impairment

Introducción y objetivos Analizar la evolución de la función renal tras nefrectomía parcial (NP) y radical (NR) laparoscópica e identificar factores predictores de deterioro de función renal.Material y método Estudio retrospectivo de pacientes birrenos con filtrado glomerular (FG) > 60 mL/min/1,73 m2 y tumor renal único cT1 tratados en nuestro centro entre los años 2005 y 2018.Resultados 372 pacientes cumplieron los criterios de inclusión para el estudio. 156 (41,9%) fueron tratados mediante NR y 216 (58,1%) mediante NP. Al alta hubo una diferencia de 26,75 mL/min/1,73 m2 de FG entre NR y NP. La edad > 60 años, las complicaciones postoperatorias (OR 2,97, p = 0,005) y NR (OR 10,03, p = 0,0001) fueron factores predictores de FG<60 mL/min/1,73 m2 al alta. Únicamente la NR (OR 7,69, p = 0,0001) se comportó como factor pronóstico independiente de FG<45 mL/min/1,73 m2 al alta. La mediana de seguimiento de la serie fue de 57 (IQR 28 - 100) meses. Al final del seguimiento, nueve (6%) pacientes tratados con NR desarrollaron enfermedad renal crónica (ERC) grave y tres (2%) insuficiencia renal terminal (IRT). Edad > 70 años, diabetes mellitus (DM) (HR 2,12, p = 0,001), hipertensión arterial (HTA) (HR 1,73, p = 0,01) y NR (HR 2,88, p = 0,0001) se comportaron como factores predictores independientes de FG<60 mL/min/1,73 m2. Para un FG<45 mL/min/1,73 m2 fueron edad > 70 años, DM (HR 1,99 IC 95% 1,04 a 3,83, p = 0,04) y NR (HR 5,88 IC 95% 2,57 a 13,45, p = 0,0001).Conclusiones La NR es un factor de riesgo a corto y largo plazo de ERC, aunque con baja probabilidad de ERC grave o IRT en pacientes con FG > 60 mL/min/1,73 m2 preoperatoria. La edad, DM e HTA contribuyen al empeoramiento de la función renal durante el seguimiento (AU)

Introduction and objectives To analyze the evolution of kidney function after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) and to identify predictive factors for deterioration in kidney function.Material and method Retrospective study of patients with two kidneys, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and single renal tumor cT1, treated in our center between 2005 and 2018.Results A total of 372 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study; 156 (41.9%) were treated by RN and 216 (58.1%) by PN. There was a difference of 26.75 mL/min/1.73 m2 in GFR between RN and PN at discharge. Age > 60 years, postoperative complications (OR 2.97, p = 0.005) and RN (OR 10.03, p = 0.0001) were predictors of GFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at discharge. Only RN (OR 7.69, p = 0.0001) behaved as an independent prognostic factor for GFR<45 mL/min/1.73m2 at discharge. The median follow-up of the series was 57 (IQR 28-100) months. At the end of the follow-up period, nine (6%) patients treated with RN developed severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) and three (2%) developed end stage renal disease (ESRD). Age > 70 years, diabetes mellitus (DM) (HR 2.12, p = 0.001), arterial hypertension (AHT) (HR 1.73, p = 0.01) and RN (HR 2.88, p = 0.0001) behaved as independent predictors of GFR<60 mL/min/1.73 m2. The independent predictors for GFR< 45 mL/min/1.73m2 were age >70 years, DM (HR 1.99 CI 95% 1.04-3.83, p = 0.04) and RN (HR 5.88 CI 95% 2.57-13.45, p = 0.0001).Conclusions RN is a short- and long-term risk factor for CKD, although with a low probability of severe CKD or ESRD in patients with preoperative GFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Age, DM and AHT contribute to worsening renal function during follow-up (AU)

Evolution of renal function in patients with cT1 renal tumors after laparoscopic partial and radical nephrectomy. Predictive factors for renal function impairment.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To analyze the evolution of kidney function after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) and to identify predictive factors for renal function impairment. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Retrospective study of patients with two kidneys, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and single renal tumor cT1, treated in our center between 2005 and 2018. RESULTS: A total of 372 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study; 156 (41.9%) were treated with RN and 216 (58.1%) with PN. There was a difference of 26.75 mL/min/1.73 m2 in GFR between RN and PN at discharge. Age >60 years, postoperative complications (OR 2.97, p = 0.005) and RN (OR 10.03, p = 0.0001) were predictors of GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at discharge. Only RN (OR 7.69, p = 0.0001) behaved as an independent prognostic factor for GFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 at discharge. The median follow-up of the series was 57 (IQR 28-100) months. At the end of the follow-up period, nine (6%) patients treated with RN developed severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) and three (2%) developed end stage renal disease (ESRD). Age >70 years, diabetes mellitus (DM) (HR 2.12, p = 0.001), arterial hypertension (AHT) (HR 1.73, p = 0.01) and RN (HR 2.88, p = 0.0001) behaved as independent predictors of GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. The independent predictors for GFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2 were age >70 years, DM (HR 1.99 CI 95% 1.04-3.83, p = 0.04) and RN (HR 5.88 CI 95% 2.57-13.45, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: RN is a short- and long-term risk factor for CKD although with a low probability of severe CKD or ESRD in patients with preoperative GFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Age, DM and AHT contribute to worsening renal function during follow-up.

Evolution of renal function in patients with CT1 renal tumors after laparoscopic partial and radical nephrectomy. Predictive factors for renal function impairment. / Evolución de la función renal en pacientes con cáncer renal cT1 después de nefrectomía parcial y radical laparoscópica. Factores predictores de deterioro de función renal.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: To analyze the evolution of kidney function after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (PN) and radical nephrectomy (RN) and to identify predictive factors for deterioration in kidney function. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Retrospective study of patients with two kidneys, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and single renal tumor cT1, treated in our center between 2005 and 2018. RESULTS: A total of 372 patients met the inclusion criteria for the study; 156 (41.9%) were treated by RN and 216 (58.1%) by PN. There was a difference of 26.75 mL/min/1.73 m2 in GFR between RN and PN at discharge. Age > 60 years, postoperative complications (OR 2.97, p = 0.005) and RN (OR 10.03, p = 0.0001) were predictors of GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 at discharge. Only RN (OR 7.69, p = 0.0001) behaved as an independent prognostic factor for GFR < 45 mL/min/1.73m2 at discharge. The median follow-up of the series was 57 (IQR 28-100) months. At the end of the follow-up period, nine (6%) patients treated with RN developed severe chronic kidney disease (CKD) and three (2%) developed end stage renal disease (ESRD). Age > 70 years, diabetes mellitus (DM) (HR 2.12, p = 0.001), arterial hypertension (AHT) (HR 1.73, p = 0.01) and RN (HR 2.88, p = 0.0001) behaved as independent predictors of GFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. The independent predictors for GFR< 45 mL/min/1.73m2 were age >70 years, DM (HR 1.99 CI 95% 1.04-3.83, p = 0.04) and RN (HR 5.88 CI 95% 2.57-13.45, p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: RN is a short- and long-term risk factor for CKD, although with a low probability of severe CKD or ESRD in patients with preoperative GFR > 60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Age, DM and AHT contribute to worsening renal function during follow-up.

Comparison between laparoscopic and open prostatectomy: Oncological progression analysis. / Comparación entre prostatectomía laparoscópica y abierta: análisis de la evolución oncológica.

INTRODUCTION: There are very few Spanish studies that compare oncological outcomes following radical prostatectomy (RP) based on surgical approach, and their methodology is not appropriate. OBJECTIVE: To compare oncological outcomes in terms of surgical margins (SM) and biochemical recurrence (BR) between open radical prostatectomy (ORP) and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Comparison of two cohorts (307 with ORP and 194 with LRP) between 2007-2015. Surgical margin status was defined as positive or negative, and BR as a PSA rise of >0.4 ng/ml after surgery. To compare the qualitative variables, we employed the Chi-squared test, and ANOVA was used for quantitative variables. We performed a multivariate analysis using logistic regression to evaluate the predictive factors of SM, and a multivariate analysis using Cox regression to evaluate the predictive factors of BR. RESULTS: Gleason 7 (3+4) was determined in the surgical specimens of 43.5% of patients, and 31.7% had positive SM. The most frequent pathological stage was pT2c, on the 61.9% of the cases. No significant differences were found between both groups, except for extracapsular extension (p=0.001), more frequent in LRP. The median follow-up was 49 months. BR was seen in the 23% of patients, without significant differences between groups. In the multivariable analysis, only the D'Amico risk group behaved as an independent predictive factor of positive SM, and Gleason score and positive SM acted as independent predictive factors of BR. CONCLUSION: The surgical approach did not influence SM status or BR.

Análisis de supervivencia de los pacientes con cáncer de próstata con factores patológicos desfavorables tratados con prostatectomía radical y radioterapia de rescate tras la recidiva y persistencia bioquímica / Survival analysis of patients with prostate cancer and unfavorable risk factors treated with radical prostatectomy and salvage radiotherapy after biochemical recurrence and persistence

OBJETIVO: Analizar la supervivencia de los pacientes con cáncer de próstata (CP) con factores pronósticos desfavorables (FPD) tratados con PR y radioterapia de rescate (RTR) tras recidiva bioquímica (RB) y persistencia bioquímica (PB). MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Análisis retrospectivo de 446 pacientes con al menos uno de los siguientes FPD: score de Gleason ≥ 8, estadio patológico ≥ pT3 y/o márgenes quirúrgicos positivos (MQ+). El criterio de RB fue la elevación del PSA por encima de 0,4 ng/ml. Evaluación de supervivencia mediante Kaplan-Meier y log-rank. Para identificar factores de riesgo con posible influencia en la respuesta a RTR y la supervivencia causa-específica (SCE) se usó análisis uni y multivariable (regresión de Cox). RESULTADOS: Mediana de seguimiento: 72 (rango 37-122) meses, mediana de tiempo hasta RB: 42 (rango 20-112) meses. El 36,3% presentaron RB. Presentaron respuesta bioquímica a la RTR 121 (74,7%) pacientes. La supervivencia libre de recaída (SLR) después de la RTR a los 3, 5, 8 y 10 años fue del 95,7, del 92,3, del 87,9 y del 85%, la SG a los 5, 10 y 15 años fue del 95,6, del 86,5 y del 73,5%. La SCE a los 5, 10 y 15 años fue del 99,1, del 98,1 y del 96,6%, respectivamente. Solo el tiempo hasta la RB < 24 meses (HR = 2,55, p = 0,01) se comportó como un factor predictor independiente de SLR después de RTR. CONCLUSIONES: La PR solo consigue control de la enfermedad a los 10años en aproximadamente la mitad de los casos. El tratamiento multimodal secuencial (PR + RTR cuando precise) aumenta este control bioquímico hasta > 87%, lográndose una larga SCE. Los pacientes con un tiempo hasta recidiva > 24 meses respondieron mejor al tratamiento de rescate

OBJECTIVE: Survival analysis of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) with adverse prognostic factors (APF) treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) and salvage radiotherapy (SRT) after biochemical recurrence (BR) or biochemical persistence (BP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 446 patients with at least one of the following APF: Gleason score ≥ 8, pathologic stage ≥ pT3 and/or positive surgical margins. BR criteria used was PSA level over 0.4 ng/ml. A survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier was performed to compare the different variable categories with log-rank test. In order to identify risk factors for SRT response and cancer specific survival (CSS) we performed univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox regression. RESULTS: Mean follow up: 72 (IQR 27-122) months, mean time to BR: 42 (IQR 20-112) months, mean PSA level at BR: 0.56 (IQR 0.42-0.96). BR was present in 36.3% of the patients. Biochemical response to SRT was observed in 121 (75.7%) patients. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates after SRT at 3, 5, 8 and 10 years were 95.7%, 92.3%, 87.9%, and 85%; overall survival (OS) rates after 5, 10 and 15 years was 95.6%, 86.5% and 73.5%, respectively. CSS rates at 5, 10 and 15 years were 99.1%, 98.1% and 96.6%. Only time to BR < 24 months (HR = 2.55, P = .01) was identified as an independent risk factor for RFS after SRT. CONCLUSIONS: In these patients, RP only controls the disease in approximately half of the cases. Multimodal sequential treatment (RP+SRT when needed) increases this control, achieving high CSS rates and biochemical control in over 87% of the patients. Patients with time to recurrence > 24 months responded better to rescue treatment

Evaluación de los patrones de recurrencia por grupos de riesgo tras nefrectomía por cáncer renal / Analysis of recurrence trends according to risk groups after renal cancer nephrectomy

INTRODUCCIÓN: No están claramente definidos los patrones de recurrencia tras nefrectomía por cáncer renal. OBJETIVO: Evaluar patrones de recidiva en función del grupo de riesgo de recurrencia (GRR). MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Análisis retrospectivo de 696 pacientes con carcinoma de células renales tratados con nefrectomía entre 1990-2010. Se definieron tres GRR según la presencia de variables anatomopatológicas (estadio pTpN, grado nuclear, necrosis tumoral [NT], diferenciación sarcomatoide [DS], margen de resección positivo [MR]): -GR bajo (GRB): pT1pNx-0 G1-4, pT2pNx-0 G1-2; no NT, DS y/o MR (+). -GR intermedio (GRI): pT2pNx-0 G3-4;pT3-4pNx-0 G1-2; GRB con NT. -GR alto (GRA): pT3-4pNx-0 G3-4; pT1-4pN+; GRI con NT y/o DS; GRB con DS y/o MR (+). Para el contraste de variables cualitativas se utilizó el test de la Chi cuadrado. El método de Kaplan-Meier se ha utilizado para evaluar la supervivencia libre de recidiva en función de los GRR. Para evaluar diferencias entre las curvas de supervivencia se ha utilizado el test de log-rank. RESULTADOS: La mediana de seguimiento fue de 105 (IQR 63-148) meses. Del total de la serie recidivaron 177 (25,4%) pacientes: 15,9% a distancia, 4,9% local y 4,6% a distancia y local. La tasa de recurrencia varió según el grupo de riesgo con tasas del 72,9% en GRA, 16,9% en GRI y 10,2% en GRB (p = 0,0001). La recurrencia en órgano único fue mayoritaria en el GRB (72,2%) (p = 0,006). El GRB presentó recidiva en forma de metástasis única en el 50% de los casos, frente al 30% y 18,6% en GRI y GRA, respectivamente (p = 0,009). Las localizaciones de recurrencia más habituales fueron pulmón y abdomen. La localización pulmonar predominó en el GRA (72,9%) (p = 0,0001) y la abdominal en el GRB (83,3%) con una tendencia a la significación (p = 0,15). CONCLUSIONES: A medida que aumenta el grupo de riesgo aumentan las recurrencias, sobre todo óseas y pulmonares. En el GRB son más frecuentes las metástasis únicas y en órgano único

INTRODUCTION: Recurrence trends after renal cell cancer nephrectomy are not clearly defined. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate recurrence trends according to recurrence risk groups (RRG). MATERIAL AND METHOD: Retrospective analysis of 696 patients with renal cell cancer treated with nephrectomy between 1990-2010. Three RRG were defined according to the presence of anatomopathological variables (pTpN stage, nuclear grade, tumor necrosis [TN], sarcomatoid differentiation [SD], positive resection margin [RM]): -Low RG (LRG): pT1pNx-0 G1-4, pT2pNx-0 G1-2; no TN, SD and/or RM (+). -Intermediate RG (IRG): pT2pNx-0 G3-4; pT3-4pNx-0 G1-2; LRG with TN. -High RG (HRG): pT3-4pNx-0 G3-4; pT1-4pN+; IRG with TN and/or SD; LRG with SD and/or RM (+). The Kaplan-Meier method has been used to evaluate recurrence-free survival as a function of RRG. The log-rank test was used to evaluate differences between survival curves. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 105 (IQR 63-148) months. Of the total series, 177 (25.4%) patients presented recurrence: distant 15.9%, local 4.9% and 4.6% distant and local. The recurrence rate varied according to the RRG with values of 72.9% for HRG, 16.9% for IRG and 10.2% for LRG (p=.0001). Most cases in LRG presented single organ recurrence (72.2%) (p=.006). The LRG experienced recurrence as single metastasis in 50% of cases, compared to 30% and 18.6% in IRG and HRG, respectively (p=.009). The most common sites of recurrence were lung and abdomen. Lung recurrence predominated in the HRG (72.9%) (p=.0001) and abdominal, in the LRG (83.3%) with a tendency to significance (p=.15). CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence rates (especially bone and lung) increase with higher RG. Single organ recurrences and single metastases are more frequent in LRG

Survival analysis of patients with prostate cancer and unfavorable risk factors treated with radical prostatectomy and salvage radiotherapy after biochemical recurrence and persistence. / Análisis de supervivencia de los pacientes con cáncer de próstata con factores patológicos desfavorables tratados con prostatectomía radical y radioterapia de rescate tras la recidiva y persistencia bioquímica.

OBJECTIVE: Survival analysis of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) with adverse prognostic factors (APF) treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) and salvage radiotherapy (SRT) after biochemical recurrence (BR) or biochemical persistence (BP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 446 patients with at least one of the following APF: Gleason score ≥8, pathologic stage ≥pT3 and/or positive surgical margins. BR criteria used was PSA level over 0.4ng/ml. A survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier was performed to compare the different variable categories with log-rank test. In order to identify risk factors for SRT response and cancer specific survival (CSS) we performed univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox regression. RESULTS: Mean follow up: 72 (IQR 27-122) months, mean time to BR: 42 (IQR 20-112) months, mean PSA level at BR: 0.56 (IQR 0.42-0.96). BR was present in 36.3% of the patients. Biochemical response to SRT was observed in 121 (75.7%) patients. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates after SRT at 3, 5, 8 and 10years were 95.7%, 92.3%, 87.9%, and 85%; overall survival (OS) rates after 5, 10 and 15years was 95.6%, 86.5% and 73.5%, respectively. CSS rates at 5, 10 and 15years were 99.1%, 98.1% and 96.6%. Only time to BR <24months (HR=2.55, P=.01) was identified as an independent risk factor for RFS after SRT. CONCLUSIONS: In these patients, RP only controls the disease in approximately half of the cases. Multimodal sequential treatment (RP+SRT when needed) increases this control, achieving high CSS rates and biochemical control in over 87% of the patients. Patients with time to recurrence >24months responded better to rescue treatment.

Analysis of recurrence trends according to risk groups after renal cancer nephrectomy. / Evaluación de los patrones de recurrencia por grupos de riesgo tras nefrectomía por cáncer renal.

INTRODUCTION: Recurrence trends after renal cell cancer nephrectomy are not clearly defined. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate recurrence trends according to recurrence risk groups (RRG). MATERIAL AND METHOD: Retrospective analysis of 696 patients with renal cell cancer treated with nephrectomy between 1990-2010. Three RRG were defined according to the presence of anatomopathological variables (pTpN stage, nuclear grade, tumor necrosis [TN], sarcomatoid differentiation [SD], positive resection margin [RM]): -Low RG (LRG): pT1pNx-0 G1-4, pT2pNx-0 G1-2; no TN, SD and/or RM (+). -Intermediate RG (IRG): pT2pNx-0 G3-4; pT3-4pNx-0 G1-2; LRG with TN. -High RG (HRG): pT3-4pNx-0 G3-4; pT1-4pN+; IRG with TN and/or SD; LRG with SD and/or RM (+). The Kaplan-Meier method has been used to evaluate recurrence-free survival as a function of RRG. The log-rank test was used to evaluate differences between survival curves. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 105 (IQR 63-148) months. Of the total series, 177 (25.4%) patients presented recurrence: distant 15.9%, local 4.9% and 4.6% distant and local. The recurrence rate varied according to the RRG with values of 72.9% for HRG, 16.9% for IRG and 10.2% for LRG (p=.0001). Most cases in LRG presented single organ recurrence (72.2%) (p=.006). The LRG experienced recurrence as single metastasis in 50% of cases, compared to 30% and 18.6% in IRG and HRG, respectively (p=.009). The most common sites of recurrence were lung and abdomen. Lung recurrence predominated in the HRG (72.9%) (p=.0001) and abdominal, in the LRG (83.3%) with a tendency to significance (p=.15). CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence rates (especially bone and lung) increase with higher RG. Single organ recurrences and single metastases are more frequent in LRG.

Modelo predictivo de mortalidad en pacientes con tumor urotelial de vejiga tras cistectomía radical / Mortality prediction model for patients with bladder urothelial tumor after radical cystectomy

OBJETIVO: Elaborar un modelo predictivo de mortalidad cáncer específica (MCE) a 1, 3, y 5 años basándonos en variables clínicas precirugía y patológicas poscirugía en pacientes con tumor urotelial vesical tratados con cistectomía radical. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Análisis retrospectivo de 517 pacientes diagnosticados de tumor urotelial vesical y tratados con cistectomía radical (1986 y 2009). Se recogieron variables demográficas, clínicas, quirúrgicas y patológicas, así como complicaciones acontecidas y evolución tras cistectomía radical. Análisis comparativo con test de Chi cuadrado y ANOVA. Cálculo de supervivencia con método de Kaplan-Meier y test de log-rank. Análisis univariante y multivariante mediante regresión logística para identificar las variables predictoras independientes de MCE. Se calculó la probabilidad individual de MCE a 1, 3 y 5 años según la ecuación general (función logística). La calibración se obtuvo mediante método de. Hosmer-Lemeshow y la discriminación con elaboración de una curva ROC (área bajo la misma). RESULTADOS: El tumor urotelial vesical fue la causa de muerte en 225 pacientes (45%). Se obtuvo una MCE el 1.°, 3.° y 5.° años del 17%, 39,2% y 46,3% respectivamente. El estadio pT y pN se identificaron como variables pronósticas independientes de MCE al 1.°, 3.° y 5.° años. Se construyeron 3 modelos predictivos. La capacidad predictiva fue del 70,8% (IC95% 65-77%, p = 0,000) para el 1.° año, del 73,9% (IC95% 69,2-78,6%, p = 0,000) para el 3.° año y del 73,2% (IC95% 68,5-77,9%, p = 0,000) para el 5.° año. CONCLUSIONES: El modelo predictivo permite estimar el riesgo de MCE a los 1, 3 y 5 años con fiabilidad del 70,8, 73,9 y 73,2% respectivamente

OBJECTIVE: Based on preoperative clinical and postoperative pathological variables, we aim to build a prediction model of cancer specific mortality (CSM) at 1, 3, and 5 years for patients with bladder transitional cell carcinoma treated with RC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 517 patients with diagnosis of cell carcinoma treated by RC (1986-2009). Demographic, clinical, surgical and pathological variables were collected, as well as complications and evolution after RC. Comparative analysis included Chi square test and ANOVA technique. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using logistic regression to identify the independent predictors of CSM. The individual probability of CSM was calculated at 1, 3 and 5 years according to the general equation (logistic function). Calibration was obtained by the Hosmer-Lemeshow method and discrimination with the elaboration of a ROC curve (area under the curve). RESULTS: BC was the cause of death in 225 patients (45%); 1, 3 and 5-year CSM were 17%, 39.2% and 46.3%, respectively. The pT and pN stages were identified as independent prognostic variables of CSM at 1, 3 and 5 years. Three prediction models were built. The predictive capacity was 70.8% (CI 95% 65-77%, p = .000) for the 1st year, 73.9% (CI95% 69.2-78.6%, p = .000) for the third and 73.2% (CI% 68.5-77.9%, p = .000) for the 5th year. CONCLUSIONS: The prediction model allows the estimation of CSM risk at 1, 3 and 5 years, with a reliability of 70.8%, 73.9% and 73.2%, respectively

Evaluación del abordaje laparoscópico en la cistectomía radical desde la implantación hasta su consolidación: validación interna / Evaluation of laparoscopic approach in radical cystectomy from implementation to consolidation: Internal validation

INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: Las Guidelines de la AEU de 2017, consideran el acceso laparoscópico o asistido por robot como procedimientos en investigación. La curva de aprendizaje se define por el número mínimo de casos que es necesario realizar para reproducir la técnica considerada como estándar. El objetivo de este estudio es analizar en el mismo servicio, la implantación de un programa de cistectomía laparoscópica (CRL), comparándolo con un programa consolidado y estandarizado de cistectomía abierta (CRA). Material y MÉTODO: Análisis de cohortes retrospectivo de dos grupos de cistectomías: CRL (n = 196) (2006-2016) frente a CRA (n = 96) (2003-2005).comparación de la evolución en el tiempo de los siguientes parámetros: tiempo quirúrgico, las necesidad de transfusión, el estado de los márgenes quirúrgicos de resección, las complicaciones postoperatorias, la duración de la estancia hospitalaria y las recidivas. Se han definido 3 periodos de tiempo para CRL: implantación (2006-09) (CRLI), desarrollo (2010-14) (CRL-D) y consolidación (2015-16) (CRL-C); comparándose cada uno de ellos con el grupo control (CRA). Para el contraste de variables cualitativas se ha utilizado el test de la Chi cuadrado y para las variables numéricas el test de Anova. RESULTADOS: La CRL, en comparación con la CRA, presentó un mayor tiempo quirúrgico en las fases de CRL-I y CRL-D, observando una tendencia de menores tiempos operatorios que la CRA en el periodo de consolidación. La CRL presenta además menor trasfusión intraoperatoria en los 3 periodos y postoperatoria en CRL-D y CRL-C, menos complicaciones totales en CRL-D y CRL-C, menos complicaciones graves (Clavien ≥ 3) en las 3 fases; así como una disminución de la mortalidad y estancia hospitalaria desde la fase de CRL-I, consolidándose esta disminución en los otros dos periodos de estudio. No hemos observado diferencias significativas entre CRA y CRL en cuanto a márgenes quirúrgicos y recurrencias ni en el total de la serie ni en la comparación entre los distintos periodos, lo que avala la seguridad de la CRL, desde su inicio. CONCLUSIONES: La CRL frente a CRA mejora desde su implantación el porcentaje de transfusiones, de complicaciones y la estancia hospitalaria, con seguridad oncológica, a expensas de un mayor tiempo quirúrgico en las fases de implantación y DESARROLLO: Sin embargo, en nuestra serie observamos una tendencia de menores tiempos quirúrgicos que la CRA en el periodo de consolidación. En nuestro servicio el abordaje laparoscópico se ha validado en el tratamiento de la cistectomía radical

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The AEU Guidelines of 2017 consider laparoscopic and robot-assisted approaches as investigational procedures. The surgical learning curve is defined as the minimum number of cases that a surgeon has to perform in order to reproduce a technique considered as standard. The aim of this study is to analyze, within our department, the implementation of a laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) program compared with a well consolidated and standardized open radical cystectomy (ORC) program. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of two cystectomy groups: LRC (n = 196) (20062016) vs. ORC (n = 96) (2003-2005).comparison of the evolution over time of the following parameters: operative time, blood transfusion rates, resection margins, postoperative complications, hospital stay and recurrence. Three time periods have been defined for LRC: implementation (2006-09) (LRC-I), development (2010-14) (LRC-D) and consolidation (2015-16) (LRC-C); comparing each of them with the control group (ORC). The chi-square test was used for the comparison of the qualitative variables and the Anova test for the numerical ones. RESULTS: When compared to ORC, LRC presented longer operative times in LRC-I and LRC-D periods. We observed a trend toward shorter operative time than ORC in the consolidation period (LRC-C). LRC also presented lower intraoperative transfusion rates in all periods and lower postoperative rates in CRL-D and CRL-C. Overall complications in LRC-D and LRC-C were lower in LRC, having fewer major complications (Clavien ≥ 3) in the 3 periods. A decrease in mortality and hospital stay after the LRC-I phase was also observed. These results were consolidated during the two last periods of the study. We have not observed significant differences between ORC and LRC when comparing surgical margins and recurrence rates, neither in the total series, nor in the comparison between the different periods. These results endorse the oncologic safety of LRC from the beginning of the implementation process. CONCLUSIONS: When compared to ORC, LRC improves perioperative transfusion rates, complications and hospital stay from its implementation period, maintaining oncological safety. On the contrary, longer operative times during implementation and development were observed. However, in our series, we observed a trend toward shorter operative times than ORC approach in the consolidation period. We have validated the laparoscopic approach for radical cystectomy in our service

Clasificación en grupos de riesgo de recurrencia tras nefrectomía por cáncer renal / Recurrence risk groups after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma

INTRODUCCIÓN: No existe consenso sobre el seguimiento tras nefrectomía por cáncer renal (CCR), siendo necesario establecer grupos de riesgo de recurrencia (GRR). OBJETIVO: Clasificar en GRR los CCR. MATERIAL Y MÉTODO: Análisis retrospectivo de 696 pacientes con cáncer renal intervenidos entre 1990-2010; 568 (81,6%) pacientes con nefrectomía radical y 128 (18,4%) con nefrectomía parcial. Se clasificaron las variables patológicas como variables de 1. er nivel: estadio pTpN y grado de Fuhrman y variables patológicas de 2. ° nivel (VP2N): diferenciación sarcomatoide (DS), necrosis tumoral (NT), infiltración microvascular y márgenes de resección (MR). Realizamos un análisis multivariante (regresión de Cox) para identificar las variables de 1. er nivel relacionadas con la recurrencia. Clasificamos a los pacientes en 3 GRR según las variables de primer nivel: bajo (GRB) < 25%, intermedio (GRI) 26-50% y alto (GRA) > 50%. Tras ello realizamos un análisis univariante y multivariante con las VP2N para cada GRR. Con estos datos se reclasificaron los pacientes en GRR+. Para la comparación de los GRR con los GRR+ se utilizaron curvas ROC. RESULTADOS: La mediana de seguimiento fue de 105 (IQR 63-148) meses. Recidivaron 177 (25,4%) PACIENTES: 111 (62,7%) con recidiva a distancia, 34 (19,2%) recidiva local y 32 (18%) a distancia y local. Se comportaron como factores predictores independientes de recurrencia el grado de Fuhrman (HR = 2,75; p = 0,0001) y el estadio pTpN (HR = 2,19; p = 0,0001). Se agruparon los pacientes en GRR (ABC = 0,76; p = 0,0001): - GRB (pT1pNx-0 G1-4; pT2pNx-0 G1-2): 456 (65,5%) pacientes. - GRI (pT2pNx-0 G3-4; pT3-4pNx-0 G1-2): 110 (15,8%) pacientes. - GRA (pT3-4pNx-0 G3-4; pT1-4pN+): 130 (18,6%) pacientes. Tras el análisis multivariable con las VP2N, los GRR se reclasificaron (GRR+) (ABC = 0,84; p = 0,0001): -GRB+: GRB sin NT, DS y/o MR(+). -GRI+: GRI; GRB con NT. -GRA+: GRA; GRB con DS y/o MR(+); GRI con NT y/o DS. CONCLUSIONES: La adición de las variables patológicas de segundo nivel a la clasificación, según las variables de primer nivel, mejora la capacidad de discriminación de la clasificación en GRR

INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus on the follow-up protocol after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and the identification of recurrence risk groups (RRG) is required. OBJECTIVE: Establish recurrence risk groups (RRG). Material and method: A retrospective analysis of 696 patients with renal cancer submitted to surgery between 1990-2010; 568 (81.6%) patients treated with radical nephrectomy and 128 (18.4%) treated with partial nephrectomy. Pathological variables were classified as: 1st-level variables (1LPV): pTpN stage and Fuhrman grade (FG); and 2nd level pathological variables (2LPV): sarcomatoid differentiation (SD), tumor necrosis (TN), microvascular invasion (MVI) and positive surgical margins (PSM). Univariate and multivariate analysis have been performed using Cox regression to determine 1LPV related to recurrence. Based on 1LPV, we classified patients into three RRG: Low (LRG) < 25%; Intermediate (IRG) 26-50% and High (HRG) > 50%. We performed univariate and multivariate analysis with the 2 LPVs for each RRG. With these data, patients were reclassified as RRG+. ROC curves were used for comparison of RRG and RRG+. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 105 months (range 63 to 148). There were 177 (25.4%) patients with recurrence: 111 (15.9%) distant, 34 (4.9%) local and 32 (4.6%) distant and local. In the multivariable analysis, Fuhrman grade (HR=2,75; P=.0001) and pTpN stage (HR = 2,19; P = .0001) behaved as independent predictive variables of recurrence. Patients were grouped as RRG (AUC = 0,76; p = 0,0001): - LRG (pT1pNx-0 G1-4; pT2pNx-0 G1-2): 456 (65,5%) PATIENTS: - IRG (pT2pNx-0 G3-4; pT3-4pNx-0 G1-2): 110 (15,8%) PATIENTS: - HRG (pT3-4pNx-0 G3-4; pT1-4pN+): 130 (18,6%) PATIENTS: After multivariate analysis with 2LPV, RRG were reclassified (RRG+) (AUC = .84, P = .0001): -LRG+(LRG without TN, SD and/or PSM(+)). -IRG+(IRG; LRG with TN) -HRG+(HRG; LRG with SD and/or PSM(+); IRG with TN and/or SD) CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of 2LPV to the classification according to VP1N improves the discriminating capacity of RRG classification

Mortality prediction model for patients with bladder urothelial tumor after radical cystectomy. / Modelo predictivo de mortalidad en pacientes con tumor urotelial de vejiga tras cistectomía radical.

OBJECTIVE: Based on preoperative clinical and postoperative pathological variables, we aim to build a prediction model of cancer specific mortality (CSM) at 1, 3, and 5 years for patients with bladder transitional cell carcinoma treated with RC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 517 patients with diagnosis of cell carcinoma treated by RC (1986-2009). Demographic, clinical, surgical and pathological variables were collected, as well as complications and evolution after RC. Comparative analysis included Chi square test and ANOVA technique. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using logistic regression to identify the independent predictors of CSM. The individual probability of CSM was calculated at 1, 3 and 5 years according to the general equation (logistic function). Calibration was obtained by the Hosmer-Lemeshow method and discrimination with the elaboration of a ROC curve (area under the curve). RESULTS: BC was the cause of death in 225 patients (45%). One, three and five-year CSM were 17%, 39.2% and 46.3%, respectively. The pT and pN stages were identified as independent prognostic variables of CSM at 1, 3 and 5 years. Three prediction models were built. The predictive capacity was 70.8% (CI 95% 65-77%, p=.000) for the 1st year, 73.9% (CI95% 69.2-78.6%, p=.000) for the third and 73.2% (CI% 68.5-77.9%, p=.000) for the 5th. CONCLUSIONS: The prediction model allows the estimation of CSM risk at 1, 3 and 5 years, with a reliability of 70.8, 73.9 and 73.2%, respectively.

Recurrence risk groups after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. / Clasificación en grupos de riesgo de recurrencia tras nefrectomía por cáncer renal.

INTRODUCTION: There is no consensus on the follow-up protocol after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma (RCC), and the identification of recurrence risk groups (RRG) is required. OBJECTIVE: Establish recurrence risk groups (RRG). MATERIAL AND METHOD: A retrospective analysis of 696 patients with renal cancer submitted to surgery between 1990-2010; 568 (81.6%) patients treated with radical nephrectomy and 128 (18.4%) treated with partial nephrectomy. Pathological variables were classified as: 1st-level variables (1LPV): pTpN stage and Fuhrman grade (FG); and 2nd level pathological variables (2LPV): sarcomatoid differentiation (SD), tumor necrosis (TN), microvascular invasion (MVI) and positive surgical margins (PSM). Univariate and multivariate analysis have been performed using Cox regression to determine 1LPV related to recurrence. Based on 1LPV, we classified patients into three RRG: Low (LRG)<25%; Intermediate (IRG) 26-50% and High (HRG)>50%. We performed univariate and multivariate analysis with the 2LPVs for each RRG. With these data, patients were reclassified as RRG+. ROC curves were used for comparison of RRG and RRG+. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 105 months (range 63 to 148). There were 177 (25.4%) patients with recurrence: 111 (15.9%) distant, 34 (4.9%) local and 32 (4.6%) distant and local. In the multivariable analysis, Fuhrman grade (HR=2,75; P=.0001) and pTpN stage (HR=2,19; P=.0001) behaved as independent predictive variables of recurrence. Patients were grouped as RRG (AUC=0,76; p=0,0001): - LRG (pT1pNx-0 G1-4; pT2pNx-0 G1-2): 456 (65,5%) patients. - IRG (pT2pNx-0 G3-4; pT3-4pNx-0 G1-2): 110 (15,8%) patients. - HRG (pT3-4pNx-0 G3-4; pT1-4pN+): 130 (18,6%) patients. After multivariate analysis with 2LPV, RRG were reclassified (RRG+) (AUC=.84, P=.0001): -LRG+(LRG without TN, SD and/or PSM(+)). -IRG+(IRG; LRG with TN) -HRG+(HRG; LRG with SD and/or PSM(+); IRG with TN and/or SD) CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of 2LPV to the classification according to VP1N improves the discriminating capacity of RRG classification.

Evaluation of laparoscopic approach in radical cystectomy from implementation to consolidation: Internal validation. / Evaluación del abordaje laparoscópico en la cistectomía radical desde la implantación hasta su consolidación: validación interna.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: The AEU Guidelines of 2017 consider laparoscopic and robot-assisted approaches as investigational procedures. The surgical learning curve is defined as the minimum number of cases that a surgeon has to perform in order to reproduce a technique considered as standard. The aim of this study is to analyze, within our department, the implementation of a laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) program compared with a well consolidated and standardized open radical cystectomy (ORC) program. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of two cystectomy groups: LRC (n=196) (20062016) vs. ORC (n=96) (2003-2005). Comparison of the evolution over time of the following parameters: operative time, blood transfusion rates, resection margins, postoperative complications, hospital stay and recurrence. Three time periods have been defined for LRC: implementation (2006-09) (LRC-I), development (2010-14) (LRC-D) and consolidation (2015-16) (LRC-C); comparing each of them with the control group (ORC). The chi-square test was used for the comparison of the qualitative variables and the Anova test for the numerical ones. RESULTS: When compared to ORC, LRC presented longer operative times in LRC-I and LRC-D periods. We observed a trend toward shorter operative time than ORC in the consolidation period (LRC-C). LRC also presented lower intraoperative transfusion rates in all periods and lower postoperative rates in CRL-D and CRL-C. Overall complications in LRC-D and LRC-C were lower in LRC, having fewer major complications (Clavien≥3) in the 3 periods. A decrease in mortality and hospital stay after the LRC-I phase was also observed. These results were consolidated during the two last periods of the study. We have not observed significant differences between ORC and LRC when comparing surgical margins and recurrence rates, neither in the total series, nor in the comparison between the different periods. These results endorse the oncologic safety of LRC from the beginning of the implementation process. CONCLUSIONS: When compared to ORC, LRC improves perioperative transfusion rates, complications and hospital stay from its implementation period, maintaining oncological safety. On the contrary, longer operative times during implementation and development were observed. However, in our series, we observed a trend toward shorter operative times than ORC approach in the consolidation period. We have validated the laparoscopic approach for radical cystectomy in our service.

Complicaciones posquirúrgicas en los pacientes con cáncer de vejiga tratados con cistectomía: Diferencias entre el abordaje abierto y laparoscópico / Post-surgical complications in patients with bladder cancer treated with cystectomy: Differences between open and laparoscopic approach

Introducción: La cirugía mínimamente invasiva en la cistectomía no ha tenido el mismo desarrollo que en otras cirugías urológicas, entre otros motivos por la falta de estudios publicados que definan las ventajas de este abordaje frente a la cirugía abierta. Objetivos: El principal objetivo de este estudio es establecer el papel de la cirugía mínimamente invasiva, laparoscopia, en la cistectomía radical frente a la cirugía abierta en un análisis de complicaciones perioperatorias. Material y método: Análisis de cohortes retrospectivo de complicaciones perioperatorias de 2series homogéneas de cistectomías: laparoscópica (n = 196) frente a abierta (n = 197). Identificación mediante análisis multivariante de factores independientes predictores de complicaciones perioperatorias. Resultados: En el análisis comparativo entre el abordaje laparoscópico y el abierto observamos una menor tasas de trasfusión perioperatoria (p < 0,0001), una menor tasa de complicaciones postoperatorias globales (p < 0,0001) así como en el subgrupo de complicaciones graves (Clavien > 3; p < 0,001). También una menor tasa de mortalidad en la serie de laparoscópica frente a la abierta (p<0,0001). Identificamos como factor independiente predictor de complicaciones al abordaje quirúrgico y la duración de la cirugía (p < 0,001). Conclusiones: En nuestro estudio identificamos el abordaje laparoscópico como protector de complicaciones en la cistectomía radical. El abordaje abierto casi triplica el riesgo de tener complicaciones

Introduction: Minimally invasive surgery regarding cystectomy has not had the same development as other urological surgeries. This could be due to the lack of published studies defining the advantages of this approach versus open surgery. Objectives: The main objective of this study is to establish the role of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic radical cystectomy, versus open surgery by analyzing their perioperative complications. Material and method: Retrospective cohort analysis of perioperative complications of 2 homogeneous series of cystectomies: laparoscopic (n=196) versus open (n = 197). Identification of independent predictors of perioperative complications by multivariate analysis. Results: In the comparative analysis between laparoscopic cystectomies and open cystectomies we observed a lower rate of perioperative blood transfusion (p < 0.0001), a lower rate of global postoperative complications (p < 0.0001) and a lower rate of serious complications (Clavien > 3; p < 0.001) in the LRC group. There was also a lower mortality rate in the laparoscopic series compared to open ones (p < 0.0001). Surgical approach and surgical time (p < 0.001) were identified as independent predictors of complications. Conclusions: We have identified the laparoscopic approach as a complication shield for radical cystectomy. The open approach almost triples the risk of complications

Influencia del acceso laparoscópico en la mortalidad cáncer-específica de los pacientes con cáncer de vejiga en un estadio pTa-2pN0R0 tratados con cistectomía radical / Influence of laparoscopic access in cancer-specific mortality of patients with pTa-2pN0R0 bladder cancer treated with radical cistectomy

Introducción y objetivo: La cirugía mínimamente invasiva representa un abordaje quirúrgico atractivo en la cistectomía radical. Sin embargo, a la espera de estudios definitivos todavía es controvertido el efecto que pudiera tener en los resultados oncológicos. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar el efecto del abordaje laparoscópico sobre la mortalidad cáncer-específica. Material y método: Estudio de cohortes retrospectivo de dos grupos de pacientes en estadio pT0-2pN0R0 sometidos a cistectomía radical abierta (CRA) (n = 191) y laparoscópica (CRL) (n = 74). Se realizó un análisis mediante regresión de Cox para identificar primero las variables predictoras y posteriormente las variables predictoras independientes relacionadas con la supervivencia. Resultados: El 90,9% fueron varones; la mediana de edad fue de 65 años y la mediana de seguimiento, de 65,5 (IQR 27,75-122) meses. Los pacientes con acceso laparoscópico presentaron de forma significativa un mayor índice ASA (p = 0,0001), un mayor tiempo entre la resección transuretral (RTU) y la cistectomía (p = 0,04), una menor tasa de transfusión intraoperatoria (p = 0,0001), un menor estadio pT (p = 0,002) y una menor incidencia de infección asociada a herida quirúrgica (p = 0,04). Al analizar los distintos factores de riesgo asociados a mortalidad cáncer-específica, solo encontramos el abordaje mediante CRA frente a CRL como factor predictor independiente de mortalidad cáncer-específica (p = 0,007). El acceso abierto a la cistectomía multiplicó el riesgo de mortalidad por 3,27. Conclusiones: En nuestra serie, cuando limitamos los distintos factores identificados asociados a mortalidad cáncer-específica analizando pacientes pT0-2N0R0, el abordaje laparoscópico no representa un factor de riesgo frente al abordaje abierto

Introduction and objective: Minimally invasive surgery represents an attractive surgical approach in radical cystectomy. However, its effect on the oncological results is still controversial due to the lack of definite analyses. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of the laparoscopic approach on cancer-specific mortality. Material and method: A retrospective cohort study of two groups of patients in a pT0-2pN0R0 stage, undergoing open radical cystectomy (ORC) (n = 191) and laparoscopic radical cystectomy (LRC) (n = 74). Using Cox regression, an analysis has been carried out to identify the predictor variables in the first place, and consequently, the independent predictor variables related to survival. Results: 90.9% were males with a median age of 65 years and a median follow-up period of 65.5 (IQR27.75-122) months. Patients with laparoscopic access presented a significantly higher ASA index (P = .0001), a longer time between TUR and cystectomy (P = .04), a lower rate of intraoperative transfusion (P = .0001), a lower pT stage (P = .002) and a lower incidence of infection associated with surgical wounds (P = .04). When analyzing the different risk factors associated with cancer-specific mortality, we only found the ORC approach (versus LRC) as an independent predictor of cancer-specific mortality (P = .007). Open approach to cystectomy multiplied the risk of mortality by 3.27. Conclusions: In our series, the laparoscopic approach does not represent a risk factor compared to the open approach in pT0-2N0R0 patients